Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIM To compare rarebit perimetry (RBP) with standard achromatic perimetry (SAP) in detecting early glaucomatous functional damage. METHODS 43 patients with ocular hypertension (OH), 39 with early primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), and 41 controls were considered. Visual fields were assessed using the Humphrey field analyser (HFA) 30-2 and RBP tests. Differences among the groups were evaluated using Student-Newman-Keuls and chi(2) tests. Correlation between HFA and RBP parameters was assessed using the Pearson's correlation coefficients and regression analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of RBP in detecting early glaucomatous visual damage were calculated with different algorithms. RESULTS RBP-mean hit rate (MHR) was respectively 88.6% (SD 4.8%) in controls; 79.1% (10.9%) in the OH group; 64.3% (13.8%) in the POAG group (differences statistically significant). Good correlation in the POAG group was found between HFA-mean deviation and RBP-MHR. Largest AROC (0.95) and optimal sensitivity (97.4%) were obtained when an abnormal RBP test was defined as having (at least 1): MHR <80%; >15 areas with a non-hit rate of >10%; > or =2 areas with a non-hit rate of >50%; at least one area with a non-hit rate of > or =70%. CONCLUSIONS The RBP appeared to be a rapid, comfortable, and easily available perimetric test (requiring only a PC device), showing a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting early glaucomatous visual field defects.
منابع مشابه
New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing
Clinical tests have a poor sensitivity to low to moderate degrees of neuro-visual damage, possibly because their test targets involve numerous receptive fields. A new test used briefly exposed microdots of high contrast. Multiple visual field areas were probed repeatedly, with ever-new microdot positions. Normal subjects responded to a median 96.0% of probes. Patients with different visual fiel...
متن کاملLearning Effect and Test-Retest Variability in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Using Rarebit Perimetry
Aim: To study learning effect (LE) and test retest variability (TRV) in healthy subjects and patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) using Rarebit perimetry (RBP). To determine normative ranges of RBP. Methods: 61 eyes of 35 subjects underwent visual field testing with standard automated perimetry (SAP) and RBP. TRV and LE were assessed in repeated examinations conducted in 3 different...
متن کاملA new visual field test in empty sella syndrome: rarebit perimetry.
PURPOSE Several visual field defects can be seen in empty sella syndrome (ESS). In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the visual field defects in patients with ESS by rarebit perimetry and to compare the results with Humphrey perimetry. METHODS Left eyes of 13 patients with ESS and left eyes of 15 age-matched normal subjects were included in the study. Visual field testing was performe...
متن کاملThe Rarebit Fovea Test - a new measure of visual function
Visual acuity (VA) measurement by the use of letter charts is the most frequently used method for testing foveal function. However, since a decimal visual acuity of 1.0, often used as limit for normality, can be achieved with less than two-thirds of the normal number of optic nerve axons, the letter chart test cannot be regarded as sensitive to low-degree damage. The reason why letter charts ar...
متن کاملRarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension.
PURPOSE To test the capability of rarebit perimetry (RP), a recent non-conventional perimetric technique, in detecting early functional damage in subjects with ocular hypertension (OHT) and to compare RP findings with those obtained by frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry. METHODS Thirty patients with OHT were matched with 30 healthy subjects. All were tested with RP and FDT. Frequen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The British journal of ophthalmology
دوره 89 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005